Home > Cannot Load > Cannot Load Module /usr/mozilla/firefox/libxul.so

Cannot Load Module /usr/mozilla/firefox/libxul.so

Not least of which is our ability to maintain a minimum viable product on aging technology and the number of users potentially affected by a de-support. What we however need is a better error handling. Comment 78 Andreas Glaeser 2013-03-21 09:09:14 PDT *** Bug 851555 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Comment 79 Folco 2013-05-08 12:38:24 PDT I get the same issue Under that line of thought, should people run Windows XP? have a peek at this web-site

But this basically means that the 17ESR “series” is (and will be?) the last series to run on Kubuntu Hardy, right? (I guess we can live with that, considering it’s an While downloading the install media files I noticed there is a new Firefox for AIX available Firefox V3.6.25.  This is a jump up from the previous one and I have had Apologies for reporting this as bug 771381. With LD_LIBRARY_PATH, you can set this for only one program, e.g.

pls is there any other link i go to to download the packaged. SP2 is from 2006? SUBSCRIBE Join & Write a Comment Already a member? Note Debian Lenny stopped receiving Debian security updates in february 2012, people shouldn't be using it to access the web.

Were you trying to say - "that kind of assistance is not in my job description, so I don't intend to do anything about it"?! These websites should be serving you the correct build for your platform. We don't control what they do or don't do or how/when they do it. Comment 43 Mike Hommey [:glandium] 2012-12-06 10:04:13 PST Firefox 17.0.1 32-bits build: $ objdump -T libxul.so |grep _ZNSbItN4base20string16_char_traitsESaItEE4_Rep20_S_empty_rep_storageE 01c2fb90 w DO .bss 00000010 Base _ZNSbItN4base20string16_char_traitsESaItEE4_Rep20_S_empty_rep_storageE Firefox 17.0.1 64-bits build: $ objdump

Clearly this is the wrong bug or wrong place for discussion of this. Comment 71 Bastiaan Welmers 2013-01-27 12:32:11 PST I downloaded the latest version of Firefox 17 ESR from https://download.mozilla.org/?product=firefox-17.0.2esr&os=linux&lang=nl and unpacked it in /opt/firefox. Logged Michael Administrator Hero Member Posts: 977 Karma: +0/-0 Re: Firefox not starting on AIX « Reply #1 on: March 17, 2014, 09:12:19 AM » back from vacation.Let me think a bash-4.2# Can you please provide any suggestion on this errors Log in to reply.

What I post in bugzilla is really quite literal. Comment 92 Zilmar 2014-03-13 06:52:25 PDT (In reply to zilmar.jr from comment #91) > (In reply to marco-ontour from comment #90) > > I installed the libdbus-glib-1-2 package for firefox 24.0a1 If you think there's a bug in Firefox then please file a new report. and Code: [Select]lslpp -L | grep -i firefox and Code: [Select]oslevel -q -s | head and Code: [Select]oslevel -sAnd also dump -X64 -H of the binary.Thanks.

Covered by US Patent. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723487 Last edited by zaxxon; 08-23-2010 at 06:23 AM.. Remove advertisements Sponsored Links kkeng808 View Public Profile Find all posts by kkeng808

« Previous Thread | Next Thread The module has an invalid magic number. I realise that I'm not using Arch's version of firefox (but I would if the language pack worked ) but I'm thinking there's just something I don't understand here about the

Mozilla may have done something similar where the firefox binary they ship expects to be in /usr instead of /usr/local.Interesting. Check This Out If you want help troubleshooting an issue with one of Mozilla's products/services, report it to support.mozilla.org. Comment 88 Anthony Hughes (:ashughes) [GFX][QA][Mentor] 2013-05-10 10:32:36 PDT (In reply to Gustavo Homem from comment #87) > I'm not taking this discussion anywhere else That's your choice but I respectfully Privacy Policy Site Map Support Terms of Use [email protected] NewAccount | Log In or Remember [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] Home | New | Browse | Search | [help] |

I remember the confounding language pack issue.I don't suppose strace could yield some insight into why it's failing or what it's attempting to load (and can't)?strace -e trace=open firefoxCould be helpful, Expected results: Firefox should start normally *Note* FF 10< works fine. According the http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/20.0/system-requirements/ Windows XP SP2 is supported. Source Last Comment Bug723487 - libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Summary: libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Status: RESOLVED FIXED Whiteboard:

So if you put /usr/local/lib/firefox in there, Arch's firefox will try to use these libraries and fail. Comment 82 Anthony Hughes (:ashughes) [GFX][QA][Mentor] 2013-05-09 10:36:29 PDT Mike Hommey, it seems like there are several comments since this was marked "fixed" who are having issues with releases (not ESR). It isn't helpful either that the download you get isn't explicitly named with "64bit" string.

First time running it I get the error: [bastiaan@baardmans ~]$ /opt/firefox/firefox XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /opt/firefox/libxpcom.so: libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Couldn't load XPCOM.

LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the only relevant environmental variable? Last edited by cfr (2012-07-08 23:42:00) How To Ask Questions The Smart Way | Help VampiresArch Linux | x86_64 | GPT | EFI boot | grub2 | systemd | LVM2 on November 08, 2016, 09:48:04 AM News Home Help Search Login Register AIX, Linux and POWER Portal » AIX » Applications » Firefox not starting on AIX « previous next » I am posting to provide a link to an open and relevant discussion.

If so, could you clarify? But it does seem to get further in this case, though I've no idea why e.g. Search Forums Show Threads Show Posts Tag Search Advanced Search Unanswered Threads Find All Thanked Posts Go to Page... unix and linux commands - unix shell scripting FIREFOX Failing have a peek here Without LD_LIBRARY_PATH [gh@localhost ~]$ firefox XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/firefox/libxpcom.so: libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Couldn't load XPCOM.

I was downgrading packages one by one until it worked, so it's possible that something else needs to be downgraded too.I had a similar problem with Thunderbird a few weeks ago.