Home > Cannot Read > Cannot Read Debug Info For @aspect To Handle Formal Binding

Cannot Read Debug Info For @aspect To Handle Formal Binding

I tried your solution, but I took the following error: Code: [junit] Message: error at ::0 Cannot read debug info for @Aspect to handle formal binding in pointcuts (please compile with Note that only aspects need to be compiled using '-g:vars"; classes could be compiled any way you want. 3. Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter: I agree to receive quotes, newsletters and other information from sourceforge.net and its partners regarding IT services and products. AOP and annotation arguments Page Title Module Move Remove Collapse X Conversation Detail Module Collapse Posts Latest Activity Search Forums Page of 1 Filter Time All Time Today Last Week Last this contact form

Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cobertura + Aspect J- problem with byte code instrumentation Initial This is invalid: " + ajInterfaceType.getName(), struct); // TODO better error location, use the method position return false; } if (!ajInterfaceType.isAssignableFrom(methodReturnType)) { reportError(getMethodForMessage(struct) + ": factory method does not return something It must be at least as visible as the type.", struct); } else { reportError("@DeclareParents: defaultImpl=\"" + defaultImplClassName + "\" has no public no-arg constructor", struct); } } if (!fieldType.isAssignableFrom(impl)) { This will ensure that the argument names are preserved in class files.

Author Posts Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total) You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Want to see them? when applying advice on advice etc if ((AjcMemberMaker.TYPEX_JOINPOINT.equals(argumentType) || AjcMemberMaker.TYPEX_PROCEEDINGJOINPOINT.equals(argumentType) || AjcMemberMaker.TYPEX_STATICJOINPOINT.equals(argumentType) || AjcMemberMaker.TYPEX_ENCLOSINGSTATICJOINPOINT.equals(argumentType) || AjcMemberMaker.AROUND_CLOSURE_TYPE .equals(argumentType))) { // continue;// skip bindings.add(new FormalBinding.ImplicitFormalBinding(argumentType, argumentName, i)); } else { bindings.add(new FormalBinding(argumentType, argumentName,

Local variable table: [pc: 10, pc:1 21] local: key: 3 type: String [pc: 6, pc: 21] local: this index: 0 type: com.example.ExampleAspect [pc: 6, pc: 21] local: __cobertura__line__number__ index: 1 type: This is not an issue with the normal AspectJ syntax. Check out the new MSN Search! Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cobertura + Aspect J- problem with byte code instrumentation Initial

Compile aspects using 'javac -g:vars" options. Please try again. or 2/3 What do you know more about? https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=202088 All other users should be unaffected by this change.

I had the same problem of passing arg names to advice by argNames. MethodSignature ms = null; Signature s = jp.getSignature(); if (s instanceof MethodSignature) { ms = (MethodSignature) s; MethodLogger methodLogger = ms.getMethod().getAnnotation(MethodLogger.class); boolean disabled = methodLogger.disable(); ... } It simply works. Bug202088 - [ataspectj] @AspectJ does not allow abstract pointcut with context Summary: [ataspectj] @AspectJ does not allow abstract pointcut with context Status: RESOLVED FIXED Product: AspectJ Classification: Tools Component: Compiler Version: Should be: @Aspect public abstract class X Pesho Petrov >Well..

Recommendation 1: Cobertura folks might have to fix the way instrumentation is performed so that the local variable table data order is retained Recommendation 2: Work around: Instead of coding the http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/ajc-error-while-compiling-abstract-pointcut-td2080787.html Recommendation 1: Cobertura folks might have to fix the way instrumentation is performed so that the local variable table data order is retained Recommendation 2: Work around: Instead of coding the https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=279298 Aspect J expects the Byte code's local variable table data to be of the following format Local variable table: [pc: 6, pc: 21] local: this index: 0 type: com.example.ExampleAspect [pc: This will again only fix bug 120356 when * compiled with ajc. * * @param deow * @param struct */ 01481 private static void setDeclareErrorOrWarningLocation(AsmManager model, DeclareErrorOrWarning deow, AjAttributeFieldStruct struct) {

struct.ajAttributes.add(new AjAttribute.DeclareAttribute(dp)); // do we have a defaultImpl=xxx.class (ie implementation) String defaultImplClassName = null; ElementNameValuePairGen defaultImplNVP = getAnnotationElement(decp, "defaultImpl"); if (defaultImplNVP != null) { ClassElementValueGen defaultImpl = (ClassElementValueGen) defaultImplNVP.getValue(); defaultImplClassName = weblink Please don't fill out this field. privacy policy Create Username Create Password Verify Password Your Email To join, you must be at least 13 years old and agree to the terms and conditions Login Username Password Forgot Use argNames in @Pointcut and @Around advice.

All Rights Reserved. You seem to have CSS turned off. Find. navigate here You may limit 'ajc' to compiling only your aspects. 2.

As soon as I move the target to another project, I can no longer use the @annotation pointcut. I understand that I can withdraw my consent at any time. if (argNamesFromAnnotation != null) { StringTokenizer st = new StringTokenizer(argNamesFromAnnotation, " ,"); List args = new ArrayList(); while (st.hasMoreTokens()) { args.add(st.nextToken()); } if (args.size() != method.getArgumentTypes().length) { StringBuffer shortString = new

Terms Privacy Opt Out Choices Advertise Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Comment 2 Ramnivas Laddad 2007-10-29 09:25:14 EDT (In reply to comment #1) > look at this for 1.5.4 - is it still a problem? > Yep, still seeing the same problem Find. Code: @Aspect class Monitor { @Pointcut("execution(@PerformenceMonitor * *(..)) && @annotation(monitoringAnnot)") public void monitored(PerformenceMonitor monitoringAnnot) {} @Around("monitored(monitoringAnnot)") public Object flagExpectationMismatch(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp, PerformenceMonitor monitoringAnnot) { long start = System.nanoTime(); Object ret = pjp.proceed(); Related on Jelly do blind people use the computer? 2 answers why does the sun blind me? 2 answers What does blind people see? 1 answer Can a blind person drive

First we try the debug info attached to the method (the LocalVariableTable) - if we cannot * find that we look to use the argNames value that may have been supplied Code: @Aspect class Monitor { @Pointcut("execution(@PerformenceMonitor * *(..)) && @annotation(monitoringAnnot)") public void monitored(PerformenceMonitor monitoringAnnot) {} @Around("monitored(monitoringAnnot)") public Object flagExpectationMismatch(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp, PerformenceMonitor monitoringAnnot) { long start = System.nanoTime(); Object ret = pjp.proceed(); Now available! #6 Jun 23rd, 2006, 09:11 AM A few options.. his comment is here Do you have used some particular configuration in source files?

First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results. What do you know more about? Recommendation 1: Cobertura folks might have to fix the way instrumentation is performed so that the local variable table data order is retained Recommendation 2: Work around: Instead of coding the